COTU Secretary General Francis Atwoli has criticised former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua over his allegations surrounding the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission’s procurement of an Integrated Elections Management System. Atwoli warned that unverified claims about the electoral process could heighten political tensions and potentially threaten the stability of the country ahead of the 2027 General Election.
Highlights
- Francis Atwoli has challenged Gachagua’s claims about the IEBC tender.
- COTU described the allegations as a “proof by assertion” approach.
- The union warned against rhetoric that could undermine confidence in the electoral process.
- Atwoli questioned Gachagua’s support for Smartmatic as an alternative provider.
- COTU called on political leaders to exercise restraint ahead of 2027.
Main Story
Atwoli Challenges Gachagua’s IEBC Claims
COTU Secretary General Francis Atwoli has cautioned Rigathi Gachagua over allegations he has raised concerning the procurement of election technology by the IEBC.
In a statement issued on Thursday, the Central Organization of Trade Unions said it was concerned by the former Deputy President’s remarks and their potential impact on public confidence in the electoral process.
Atwoli accused Gachagua of relying on what he described as a “proof by assertion” approach, warning that unsubstantiated claims could contribute to political instability.
Concerns Over 2027 Election Tensions
COTU said inflammatory political rhetoric surrounding the electoral process could have serious consequences for ordinary Kenyans.
The union warned that electoral and ethnic tensions would not only affect politicians but could disrupt livelihoods and disproportionately impact workers, women and children.
It also expressed concern that allegations made before the election could contribute to efforts to reject the eventual results before Kenyans even go to the ballot.
COTU Defends IEBC Independence
The workers’ organisation also pointed to the constitutional independence of the IEBC.
COTU cited Article 249(2) of the Constitution, arguing that the electoral commission is mandated to operate independently and that political actors should not dictate how it carries out its responsibilities.
The union maintained that anyone with genuine concerns about the procurement process should use the available legal and institutional mechanisms instead of making unsupported public accusations.
Atwoli Questions Smartmatic Endorsement
COTU also turned its attention to Gachagua’s apparent preference for Smartmatic as an alternative election technology provider.
The union questioned why Gachagua would criticise the IEBC for allegedly favouring one company while seemingly recommending another private firm.
According to COTU, Gachagua should explain the basis for his position and why he believes Smartmatic should be considered the preferred provider.
The union argued that such an endorsement could undermine the very argument being made against the IEBC procurement process.
Call for Political Restraint
With the 2027 General Election approaching, COTU urged political leaders to be cautious in their public statements.
The organisation warned that political and ethnic conflict could have far-reaching economic and social consequences, particularly for Kenyans who depend on stable businesses and employment.
The latest exchange adds to the growing political debate surrounding Kenya’s election technology ahead of the next General Election.
As competing claims continue to emerge, scrutiny of the IEBC procurement process is likely to intensify, while Kenyans will be watching whether political leaders can raise legitimate concerns without inflaming tensions.
With the 2027 election drawing closer, the biggest test may be whether Kenya’s political class can challenge the electoral system without weakening public trust in it.
