Former Uasin Gishu Governor and current Senator Jackson Mandago has been acquitted alongside two co-accused in the Ksh1.1 billion Finland education scholarship case after a Nakuru court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against them.
The decision brings an end to a high-profile case that involved allegations of fraud linked to an overseas education programme that affected hundreds of students and families.
Highlights
- Jackson Mandago and two others have been acquitted.
- Court found the prosecution did not meet the required legal threshold.
- The case involved a controversial Finland and Canada education programme.
- 138 witnesses testified during the trial.
- Families had accused the programme of leaving students with financial burdens.
Main Story
Court Clears Mandago and Co-Accused
Nakuru Senior Principal Magistrate Alloyce Ndege has acquitted former Uasin Gishu Governor Jackson Mandago and his two co-accused in the Ksh1.1 billion Finland education scholarship case.

The court ruled that the evidence presented by the prosecution was not sufficient to prove the charges against the accused persons.
The judgment, which had initially been expected earlier in the week, was delivered on Wednesday after a delay caused by paperwork issues.
Prosecution Presented 138 Witnesses
During the trial, the prosecution called 138 witnesses, with many being students and parents who had participated in the overseas education programme.
The witnesses told the court that they had been informed that a single payment would cover the requirements for their placement and studies abroad.
However, several students testified that after making payments, they were later required to pay additional charges, leaving many struggling with debts.
Court Finds Evidence Insufficient
While acknowledging the testimonies presented, Magistrate Ndege ruled that the prosecution had not established a case that met the legal standard required for conviction.
The court noted that although victims described challenges they experienced under the programme, the evidence did not prove criminal responsibility against the accused persons.
The magistrate consequently dismissed the charges and acquitted Mandago and his co-accused.
Background of the Finland Scholarship Case
The case originated from the Uasin Gishu overseas education programme, which promised students opportunities to study in Finland and Canada.
Hundreds of families reportedly contributed money towards the initiative, hoping their children would secure university placements abroad.
The programme later faced controversy after students and parents raised concerns over payments, unclear processes and financial difficulties.
Mandago’s Legal Battle Ends
The acquittal marks the conclusion of one of the most closely followed legal cases involving a Kenyan county leadership programme.
Mandago, who served as Uasin Gishu Governor before becoming a senator, had denied the allegations throughout the proceedings.
The ruling highlights the importance of strong evidence in court while reminding institutions that public trust depends on transparency and accountability.