President William Ruto has openly criticized a court decision that bars police from setting up roadblocks, questioning how law enforcement is expected to function under such restrictions. His comments come amid rising tension between the Judiciary and Executive over public protest management.
Highlights:
- Ruto reacts to a court order barring police from erecting roadblocks.
- Says the move undermines public safety during chaotic protests.
- Accuses unnamed petitioners of weakening security operations.
- The Judiciary had ruled that such barricades violate constitutional freedoms.
Main Story:
Speaking at an event in Nairobi, President William Ruto expressed frustration over a recent High Court order that prohibited police from erecting roadblocks during protests. “Kuna mtu ameenda kortini ati polisi wasiweke road block,” he said, implying disbelief and concern over the ruling.
The order, issued after a petition by civil society groups, aimed to safeguard the constitutional rights of movement and assembly, particularly during protests. However, Ruto argued that such limitations handicap the police and put public safety at risk — especially in volatile protest environments.
This marks another chapter in the ongoing friction between the Executive and Judiciary. While Ruto pushes for a firm hand against unrest and looting, the courts are emphasizing civil liberties and lawful conduct by state actors. Legal experts warn that such tension could deepen if not managed through dialogue and constitutional respect.
Kenyans remain split on the matter. Some support the court’s stand for civil rights, while others back Ruto’s argument that police must be empowered to maintain order. The incident reflects the broader national debate on balancing freedom and security in politically charged times.
As protests continue to shake the country, will the battle over roadblocks define the next chapter of Kenya’s democracy?
