In a major twist to the investigation into Albert Ojwang’s death, Constable James Mukhwana has confessed to deleting messages exchanged with his superior, OCS Samson Talaam, following the brutal assault of the popular blogger in custody. The officer claims he was instructed to keep silent, fueling concerns of a coordinated police cover-up.
Highlights
- PC Mukhwana admits he deleted chats with OCS Talaam after the incident
- Says Talaam warned him not to discuss the matter over the phone
- Reveals DIG Lagat ordered Ojwang’s assault through a chain of command
- Supports claims that inmates were paid to beat Ojwang
- Officer seeks witness protection after facing threats
Main Story
Constable James Mukhwana, who was on duty the night Albert Ojwang was brought into Central Police Station, has come forward with a stunning confession. He admitted to deleting a WhatsApp conversation with OCS Samson Talaam shortly after the incident, claiming Talaam told him to avoid phone conversations and use secure lines only.

According to Mukhwana’s sworn statement to IPOA, the command to assault Ojwang originated from Deputy Inspector General Eliud Lagat and was relayed through Talaam. He described being instructed not to question the order and to remain “in line.”
Initially, Mukhwana had misled IPOA in his first interview, claiming he was unaware of any wrongdoing. But he returned to correct his statement, saying he feared being made the scapegoat. That’s when he admitted to deleting his chats and described the involvement of other officers and inmates.
Mukhwana confirmed that four inmates were promised money and alcohol to carry out the beating. He said the situation spiraled out of control, and Ojwang sustained severe injuries, ultimately leading to his death.

The constable has since requested witness protection, citing threats and surveillance by unknown individuals. His lawyer claims Mukhwana fears retaliation from within the police service and needs urgent security reassurances.
When silence is bought and truth deleted, who protects the people from those sworn to protect them?