Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has formally addressed all diplomatic missions and international organisations in Kenya, outlining the government’s position on the deadly June 25 protests. In his statement, Mudavadi reaffirmed Kenya’s commitment to human rights while cautioning foreign partners against overstepping diplomatic boundaries.
Highlights
- Mudavadi sent a formal letter to all embassies and global organisations in Nairobi.
- He emphasised Kenya’s right to manage internal affairs without foreign interference.
- The government promised to investigate any misconduct through local legal channels.
- The statement follows global condemnation of police brutality during the protests.
- Mudavadi stressed the importance of mutual respect in diplomatic relations.
Main Story
In the wake of international concern following the June 25 protests, which left multiple civilians dead, Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi issued a formal diplomatic statement on behalf of the Kenyan government. The letter, sent to all foreign missions and international bodies, defended the state’s handling of the protests while affirming its respect for human rights and constitutional order.
Mudavadi acknowledged the right of Kenyans to peacefully demonstrate, but cautioned that the state also had a responsibility to maintain law and order. He condemned any unlawful acts committed during the protests and stated that any allegations of police abuse would be handled by Kenya’s judicial and oversight institutions.
In a strongly worded section of the letter, Mudavadi warned foreign envoys against becoming “overly prescriptive” in their commentary on Kenyan internal matters. He urged international partners to maintain mutual respect and refrain from statements that could inflame public tension or undermine sovereignty.
Despite Mudavadi’s message, human rights groups and global institutions—including the United Nations—continue to call for independent investigations into the use of force by police during the June 25 protests. The government maintains that such reviews will take place under the country’s existing legal framework.
Mudavadi’s message walks a tightrope: defending sovereignty while trying to soothe global criticism. But as pressure mounts, will words be enough—or will action speak louder?
